Ischemia of the glans 24 hours after circumcision: A case report and therapeutic solution.

INTRODUCTION:: Circumcision is a common surgical procedure, typically performed under local anesthesia and somehow also as outpatient clinic. Although complications are rare and most frequently related to the procedure itself, ischemia of the glans may occur as a major complication and can be related to local ischemia following dorsal penile nerve block. CASE DESCRIPTION:: We describe the case of a 33-year-old patient who underwent circumcision at our institution and, 24 h after the procedure, developed an acute ischemia of the glans; a re-intervention was performed in emergency setting to ensure a large, not-tightened circular suture under the glans, and low-molecular-weight heparin and antiplatelet therapy was introduced to achieve anti-coagulative/antiaggregant effects. After 48 h, the skin returned to its normal color and in 7 days the penile glans achieved complete remission of the ischemic aspect. A 6-month follow-up confirmed regular outcomes with normal erectile functions. CONCLUSION:: The treatment we proposed to treat acute post-circumcision ischemia of the glans is a simple and effective one, with a perfect aesthetic and functional outcome observed within 4 weeks and confirmed at 6-month follow-up.

Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the rates of positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy in patients undergoing robotic surgery (robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy [RALP]) compared with those undergoing open surgery (radical retropubic prostatectomy [RRP]), at an institution with medium case load. METHODS: Retrospective consultation of a perspectively-maintained database that stores the data of all the patients submitted to radical prostatectomy at our institution since 1/2008. The indication to RRP vs. RALP was based almost exclusively on the period of the study: RRP was the sole available option between 1/2008 and 3/2010 and afterwards RALP become the standard of treatment, once a learning curve of 50 cases was concluded. A PSM was defined as the presence of cancer at the inked surface of prostate. A univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression estimated which factors were related to PSMs. RESULTS: The data of 576 patients (285 RRP, 291 RALP) were evaluated. The overall PSM rate was 28.1% (162/414 patients; 20.6% for pT2 stage, 51.8% for pT>2); overall PSM rate for RRP vs. RALP was 31.9% vs. 24.4 % (P=0.044). At multivariable analysis the factors related to the risk of PSM were stage pT>2 (RR 2.979, P=0.001), Gleason Score >6 (RR 1.662, P=0.026), the volume of tumor (RR 1.019, P=0.008) and the surgical technique (RALP vs. RRP, RR 0.647, P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: In a series from a medium case-load institution, once data are adjusted for local staging, tumor volume and Gleason score, the risk of PSM is lower for RALP than RRP. This evidence could be of support for health-care practitioners to introduce robotic systems.

Transmesenteric approach for left transperitoneal renal surgery: technique and experience.

INTRODUCTION: In the last few years laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of several urological diseases such as renal cancer and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). A transmesenteric approach for left laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been recently described in order to avoid bowel manipulation and the potentially related complications. The aim of the present study is to describe the surgical technique and the advantages of the transmesenteric approach for laparoscopic pyeloplasty, pyelolithotomy, and simple nephrectomy in our experience. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From December 2007 to May 2010, 12 laparoscopic procedures for left renal diseases were performed using a transmesenteric approach. The indications were left UPJO in 9 cases, left pelvic-ureteral stones in 2 cases, and left end-stage kidney disease in one case. RESULTS: No conversions or intraoperative complications were observed. No blood transfusions were required. Resumption of oral intake and canalization occurred in all cases within 48 hours of the procedure. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic transmesenteric approach represents an interesting and advantageous technical improvement of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of left renal diseases.